Каква моћна улога младе Јелене Јовичић, фаца и фризура циге док пева и набраја текст који једва ишта разумем, али музика ми данима не избија из главе. 😅😂
Something I always thought about is the comment made by the russian astronaut... giving lessons about how HAL series operates to Dr. Chandra, the creator of HAL series himself!!!
Actually one of them would be left. The one that Dave Bowman jettisoned the hatch from. The other two , one of them was lost when Frank Poole was killed, the other disappeared with Dave!
@MF Nickster Yes, but... among other things, in 2001 Dave takes pod 3 (apparently) after Frank, and the middle pod - apparently #2 - is missing, cuz that's the one Frank took out. Near the end of the movie, when Dave goes out to the Monolith we see the middle doors - Pod 2 - open, when there wouldn't have been a Pod there any more.
@@genitalexhibitor1868 i know rascality when I read it..The Kubrick traveling museum show was something else. His plotting and graphs for his Napoleon project are boggling. I assume you've seen Dr. Strangelove and Lolita.
The part that's cut short here is that Chandra says that HAL was told to lie, something he (HAL) was incapable of. Then blames Floyd who gets angry and says, "I didn't know!". Haywood Floyd didn't know those orders were given to HAL.
Yes it's a crucial part of the scene. If you watch 2001 you'll see that this is a discrepancy between the two movies. In 2001, when Bowman disconnects HAL it triggers a prerecorded briefing by Floyd, which was meant to be played to the whole crew. In this briefing Floyd says that discovery of the monolith on the moon, and the purpose of the mission to investigate the target of the radio transmission which it sent to Jupiter, was known only to HAL during the voyage there. In 2010 he says 'I didn't authorize anyone to tell HAL about the monolith', so he's either lying or Hyams retconned the screenplay to avoid making Floyd look like a villain.
@@pauljackson2409 The entire dialog show Floyd lying to everyone in the scene. He did the same exact way in 2001 when he was talking to the Russians. Well not exactly, calm in 2001 more angry in 2010.
Why are they leaning on things? There's no gravity in the pod bay. Why is there no heat sink on the top retro nozzle where Floyd's elbow rests? Also, why is Dr. Chandra not Indian? Cheap knock off. Wrong monolith (Clarke's fault). Bad story (Clarke needed money). Stick to 2001.
That's a bit harsh. I thought that it was better than most sci-fi movies of the time. It must have been pretty daunting for Peter Hyams to direct a sequel to such an iconic movie.
@@Admiral8Q well even in the original. I just watched both movies and there are hug discrepancies in the size between outside and inside dimensions. It keeps me up because as a kid I loved SciFi and dimensional drawings to the point I made a profession out of it until a nasty divorce and back injury left me homeless and scrubbing toilets and bouncing around psyche wards and well let's just say that I never made it to my dream of being a youtuber or writing scifi or attending convention where these matters were discussed among friends and that I just watch videos now to hide the pain that one day I'll either die in a ditch or get picked up by the police and spend my days talking to myself and biting popsicle sticks while nurse ratchet laughs at my little pecjker and reminds me over and over how I'm a worthless excuse for a human being while I'm strapped to the table. God I need a time portal
In the original, where zero gravity plays a role makes more sense. The ball in the front hosts a spining centrifuge wheel which the astronauts spend most of the time, this pod bay at the bottom and a control cockpit on top. The rest, like 80% of the ship is propulsion, and other mechanical elements
Check schematics and blueprints available on the net for the Discovery. Dimensions are fine. Centrifuge was located in the aft section of the ball, not centre. I used to think that the rotation of Discovery over Io in 2010 was wrong too. Wrong axis, I thought. But then I found out that such rotation can be flipped in space so possibly rotation along longitudinal axis was not a mistake.
A familiar scene, decades past, in central Oregon...illegals gathering and being distributed to the fields or the robes waiting for the rest of the members. Either scary to a kid.
Watching this growing up wonder I ended up obsessed with alternatively styled women
I wanna live this life
Каква моћна улога младе Јелене Јовичић, фаца и фризура циге док пева и набраја текст који једва ишта разумем, али музика ми данима не избија из главе. 😅😂
Quelle puissance ce cinéma...Une oeuvre d'art que je redécouvre avec toujours la même intensité. Un grand maître du septième art !
Are we going to ignore the fact that smell was a peadophile in this movie
Shit editing stopping the scene mid sentence and before it fully plays out.
Something I always thought about is the comment made by the russian astronaut... giving lessons about how HAL series operates to Dr. Chandra, the creator of HAL series himself!!!
Chandra's full name (as per Clarke's novel) is: Sivasubramanian Chandrasegararampillai.
Najjaci film srbi moji dragi
_And they all "lived" assimilated by space pods ever after!_
So how is there gravity? If it isn't spinning like the living quarters?
Ah, Hollywood.
All there is to life in about two minutes.
Smradovi komunisticki olosi i bagre Prokleto im bilo sto su sve radili piiii
Cool bro
Have to sort of laugh at the Russian trying to tell the guy who built HAL how it works. LMAO
Well, he was a specialist at Chandra's level, so...
The black flooring is supposed to be Velcro. There is no gravity in that room. Why are people leaning on things?
Douglas Rain’s voice as the HAL-9000 is straight ASMR.
Actually HAL did lie, repeatedly. But it messed "him" (really "it") up.
Funnily enough in 2011 we learned more about AI, a grandmaster of Go was beaten by Deep Thought.
Who searched up 2010 videos and found this
1:30 - 1:48
That set should be in a museum, even though the pod looks a bit more chalky than the original.
There should be no pods left in the pod bay. Opps.
Actually one of them would be left. The one that Dave Bowman jettisoned the hatch from. The other two , one of them was lost when Frank Poole was killed, the other disappeared with Dave!
@@mikegallant811 I don't think there's any evidence that the jettisoned-hatch one was returned to the bay.
Ironically, the one that was left was the one that Poole and Bowman had their conversation in where HAL read their lips.
@MF Nickster Yes, but... among other things, in 2001 Dave takes pod 3 (apparently) after Frank, and the middle pod - apparently #2 - is missing, cuz that's the one Frank took out. Near the end of the movie, when Dave goes out to the Monolith we see the middle doors - Pod 2 - open, when there wouldn't have been a Pod there any more.
Loved that Candace Bergen played another AI unit. Could listen to 1984 era Candace all day.
What would the white room be if only HAL had gotten there? And the Star Child?
Oh really
This movie has become real in 2020.
My thoughts exactly, beware of the vaccine!
@@MrRadiorobot whatever you say. You nutjob
It truly has. vaxxed vs unvaxed
Kultni intro za kultni film.
Absolutely heartbreaking and profound intro when you have seen the film, no one did cinema like Kieslowski
Quiero la película completa
Great OODA-loop stuff.
HAL was told to lie, by people who find it easy to lie. HAL doesn't know how.
I remember that touching line was next.
Actually HAL did lie, repeatedly. But it messed "him" (really "it") up.
@@eugenekerr217 I was quoting Dr. Chandra, approximately 10 seconds after this clip ended.
@@jjdillon23 Yes I know, but Chandra was wrong. He at least implied that HAL COULDN'T lie. Obviously HAL COULD lie, and did.
@@eugenekerr217 HAL was caught in a program loop error. It wasn't his fault.
I AM ARK ANGEL MICHAEL I AM PISSED BY THIS ASSAULT OF HAL MY A.I. UNIT COMMAND SERGEANT MAJOR GENERAL OF ALL ARMYS PISSED ME OFF GODDAMMITT
All the efforts Kubrick made to create a zero gravity environment were simply dismissed by this version.
Too expensive to duplicate.
As much as I loved the original many ides used wouldn’t hold a 1985 audience such as no gravity, no sound in space etc...
Kubrick was an idiot and 2001:A Space Odyssey was criminally overrated to begin with.
@@genitalexhibitor1868 i know rascality when I read it..The Kubrick traveling museum show was something else. His plotting and graphs for his Napoleon project are boggling. I assume you've seen Dr. Strangelove and Lolita.
@@genitalexhibitor1868 yes idiots create the first satellites all the time.
The part that's cut short here is that Chandra says that HAL was told to lie, something he (HAL) was incapable of. Then blames Floyd who gets angry and says, "I didn't know!". Haywood Floyd didn't know those orders were given to HAL.
Yes it's a crucial part of the scene. If you watch 2001 you'll see that this is a discrepancy between the two movies. In 2001, when Bowman disconnects HAL it triggers a prerecorded briefing by Floyd, which was meant to be played to the whole crew. In this briefing Floyd says that discovery of the monolith on the moon, and the purpose of the mission to investigate the target of the radio transmission which it sent to Jupiter, was known only to HAL during the voyage there. In 2010 he says 'I didn't authorize anyone to tell HAL about the monolith', so he's either lying or Hyams retconned the screenplay to avoid making Floyd look like a villain.
@@pauljackson2409 The entire scene could have been made for Floyd to actually be guilty but claim plausible deniability.
@@pauljackson2409 The entire dialog show Floyd lying to everyone in the scene. He did the same exact way in 2001 when he was talking to the Russians. Well not exactly, calm in 2001 more angry in 2010.
It's amazing he had to deal with 2 great whites and then Hal in deep space
@Stephen.... and Gene Hackman in The French Connection!!
And drug addiction.
But he got to fly Blue Thunder!
Why are they leaning on things? There's no gravity in the pod bay. Why is there no heat sink on the top retro nozzle where Floyd's elbow rests? Also, why is Dr. Chandra not Indian? Cheap knock off. Wrong monolith (Clarke's fault). Bad story (Clarke needed money). Stick to 2001.
That's a bit harsh. I thought that it was better than most sci-fi movies of the time. It must have been pretty daunting for Peter Hyams to direct a sequel to such an iconic movie.
@Kevin Geaslin Also, since when do CRT monitors replace flat screens?
Le sacrer zeralda !
One of the things that keep me up at night is the discrepancy between the interior and exterior dimensions of the Discovery.
Same here. But in the movie "2010" it doesn't count. ;)
@@Admiral8Q well even in the original. I just watched both movies and there are hug discrepancies in the size between outside and inside dimensions. It keeps me up because as a kid I loved SciFi and dimensional drawings to the point I made a profession out of it until a nasty divorce and back injury left me homeless and scrubbing toilets and bouncing around psyche wards and well let's just say that I never made it to my dream of being a youtuber or writing scifi or attending convention where these matters were discussed among friends and that I just watch videos now to hide the pain that one day I'll either die in a ditch or get picked up by the police and spend my days talking to myself and biting popsicle sticks while nurse ratchet laughs at my little pecjker and reminds me over and over how I'm a worthless excuse for a human being while I'm strapped to the table. God I need a time portal
In the original, where zero gravity plays a role makes more sense. The ball in the front hosts a spining centrifuge wheel which the astronauts spend most of the time, this pod bay at the bottom and a control cockpit on top. The rest, like 80% of the ship is propulsion, and other mechanical elements
Check schematics and blueprints available on the net for the Discovery. Dimensions are fine. Centrifuge was located in the aft section of the ball, not centre. I used to think that the rotation of Discovery over Io in 2010 was wrong too. Wrong axis, I thought. But then I found out that such rotation can be flipped in space so possibly rotation along longitudinal axis was not a mistake.
2:00 Roy Sheider's character gets 'slapped' again.
Zouina meskina
This is creepy at 1:22. They all gather around and they are doing the evil plan with the pods.
@biene whatever you say. You nutjob
Repost the full version instantaneously!
Es ist ein schönes Video. Ausserdem es ist auf Deutsch...
A familiar scene, decades past, in central Oregon...illegals gathering and being distributed to the fields or the robes waiting for the rest of the members. Either scary to a kid.
How could you possibly cut that speech short? Criminal.
You got that right!
2:41 Zoran Simjanovic - Srbijance - Bure baruta - (Audio 2006) HD RUclips app · Multimedia Music Nov 24, 2013
Lindaaaaa kisses from Brazil 🇧🇷
Skin heads
Very important Science Fiction Movie!😱👽🛸🌱🌿
This is creepy at 1:22. They all gather around and they are doing the evil plan with the pods.